Gangs Essay Research Paper GANGS free essay sample

Gangs Essay, Research Paper GANGS Gangs are a violent world that people have to cover within today # 8217 ; s metropoliss. What has made these groups come about? Why do childs experience that being in a pack is both an acceptable andprestigious manner to populate? The long scope reply to thesequestions can merely be speculated upon, but in the short termthe replies are much easier to happen. On the surface, gangsare a direct consequence of human existences # 8217 ; personal wants and peerpressure. To find how to efficaciously stop pack force wemust happen the manner that these ethical motives are given to the person. Unfortunately, these can merely be hypothesized. However, bylooking at the manner worlds are influenced in society, I believethere is good grounds to indicate the incrimination at severalinstitutions. These include the forces of the media, thegovernment, theater, drugs and our economic system. On the surface, packs are caused by equal force per unit area andgreed. Many teens in packs will coerce equals into becomingpart of a pack by doing it all sound glamourous. Money is alsoan important factor. A child ( a 6-10 twelvemonth old, who is non yet amember ) is shown that s/he could do $ 200 to $ 400 for smallpart clip pack occupations. Although these are of import factors theyare non strong plenty to do childs make things that are stronglyagainst their ethical motives. One of the ways that childs ethical motives are dead set so that gangviolence becomes more acceptable is the influence of televisionand films. The mean child spends more clip at a Television thanshe/he spends in a schoolroom. Since cipher can wholly turnoff their heads, childs must be larning something while watchingthe Television. Very few hours of telecasting watched by kids areeducational, so other thoughts are being absorbed during this periodof clip. Many shows on telecasting today are highly violentand are frequently shown this from a pack # 8217 ; s position. A normaladult can see that this is demoing how insultingly that packs areliving. However, to a kid this portrays a violent gangexistance as acceptable. # 8216 ; The Ends Justifies the Means # 8217 ; outlook is besides taught through many shows where the # 8220 ; goodyguy # 8221 ; captures the # 8220 ; bad cat # 8221 ; through force and is so beingcommended. A immature kid sees this a absolutely acceptablebecause he knows that the # 8220 ; bad cat # 8221 ; was incorrect but has no ideaof what acceptable apprehensiveness techniques are. Gore in telecasting besides takes a large portion in influencingyoung heads. Children see bloodstained scenes and are fascinated bythese things that they have non seen before. Older viewing audiences seegore and are non concerned with the blood but instead with thepain the victim must experience. A younger head doesn # 8217 ; Ts make thisconnection. Thus a Gore captivation is formed, and has beenseen in several of my equals. Unfortunately childs raised wit hthis kind of telecasting terminal up turning up with a strongerpropensity to going a violent pack member or # 8216 ; violent-acceptant # 8217 ; individual. # 8220 ; Gangs bring the delinquent norms of society intointimate contact with the individual. # 8221 ; 1, ( Marshall B Clinard,1963 ) . So, as you can see if Television leads a kid to believe thatviolence is the norm this will attest itself in the actions ofthe child rather, frequently in a pack state of affairs. This is particularly thecase when parents don # 8217 ; t pass a batch of clip with their childs atthe Television explicating what is right and what is incorrect. Quite oftennewer books and some types of music will implement this type ofthought and thoughts. Once this outlook is installed in childs they becomeincreasingly prone to being easy pushed into a pack state of affairs byany job at place or elsewhere. For case, in poorfamilies with many kids or upper-middle category households whereparents are ever working, the kids will frequently experience deprivedof love. Parents can frequently experience that seting nutrient on the tableis adequate love. Children of these households may frequently travel to thegang foremost out of ennui and to belong someplace. As timegoes on, a signifier of love or affinity develops between the gangmembers and the kid. It is so that the bond between thekid and the pack is completed because the pack has effectivelytaken the topographic point of the household. The new anti societal construction of metropoliss besides effects theease in which a boy/girl can fall in a pack. # 8221 ; The formation ofgangs in metropoliss, and most late in suburbs, is facilitated by the same deficiency of community among parents. The parents do notknow what their qi ldren are doing for two reasons: First, muchof the parents’ lives is outside the local community, while thechildren’s lives are lived almost totally within it. Second, in afully developed community, the network of relations gives everyparent, in a sense, a community of sentries who can keep himinformed of his child’s activities. In modern living-places (cityor suburban), where such a network is attenuated, he no longerhas such sentries.†2, (Merton Nisbet, 1971). In male gangs problems occur as each is the members triesto be the most manly. This often leads to all membersparticipating in â€Å"one-up-manship†. Quite often this will thenlead to each member trying to commit a bigger and more violentcrime or simply more crimes than the others. With all membersparticipating in this sort of activity it makes for a neverending unorganized violence spree (A sort of Clockwork Orangementality). In gangs with more intellegent members thesefeelings end up maki ng each member want to be the star whenthe groups commit a crime. This makes the gang much moreorganized and improves the morale of members which in turnmakes them more dangerous and very hard for the police to dealwith and catch (There is nothing harder to find and deal withthan organized teens that are dedicated to the group). Thissort of gang is usually common of middle or upper class peoplealthough it can happen in gangs in the projects and other lowrent districts too. This â€Å"one-up-manship† is often the reason between rivalgangs fighting. All gangs feel powerful and they want to befeared. To do this they try to establish themselves as theonly gang in a certain neighborhood. After a few gang fightshatred forms and gang murders and drive-by’s begin to takeplace. When two gangs are at war it makes life very dangerousfor citizens in the area. Less that 40% of drive-by’s killtheir intended victim yet over 60% do kill someone. This gangapplication is one of t he many reasons that sexual sterotypesand pressure to conform to the same must be stopped. Lastly one of the great factors in joining a gang is forprotection. Although from an objective point of view, we cansee joining a gang brings more danger than it saves you from,this is not always the way it is seen by kids. In slums such asthe Bronx or the very worst case, Compton, children will nodoubt be beaten and robbed if they do not join a gang. Ofcourse they can probably get the same treatment from rivalswhen in a gang. The gang also provides some money for thesechildren who quite often need to feed their families. Thereason kids think that the gang will keep them safe is frompropoganda from the gangs. Gang members will say that no onewill get hurt and make a public show of revenge if a member ishurt or killed. People in low rent areas are most often being represseddue to poverty and most importantly, race. This often resultsin an attitude that motivates the person to base his/her lifeo n doing what the system that oppresses them doesn’t want. Although this accomplishes little it is a big factor in gangenrollment. So, as you have seen gangs are a product of theenvironment we have created for ourselves. Some of thesefactors include: oppression, the media, greed, violence andother gangs. There seems to be no way to end the problem ofgangs without totally restructuring the modern economy andvalue system. Since the chance of this happening is minimal, wemust learn to cope with gangs and try to keep their followingto a minimum. Unfortunately there is no real organized forceto help fight gangs. Of course the police are supposed to dothis but this situation quite often deals with racial issues alsoand the police forces regularly display their increasing inabilityto deal fairly with these issues. What we need are more peopleto form organizations like the â€Å"Guardian Angels† a gang-likegroup that makes life very tough for street gangs that arebreaking laws. BibliographyMargot Webb, Coping with Street Gangs. Rosen Publishing Group,New York, 1990. William Foote Whyte, Street Corner Society. University ofChicago, Chicago, 1955. Peter Carroll, South-Central. Hoyte and Williams, L. A., 1987. 1 Marshall B. Clinard, Sociology of Deviant Behavior. Universityof Wisconsin, Wisconsin, 1963, Page 179. 2 Merton Nisbet, Contempory Social Problems. Harcourt, Brace World, New York, 1971, Page 588.